Members Log in | Not a member? Register 17 May 2012
Gramophone The Archive


July 1963 - page          
29
Report an error
DVORAK. Symphony No. 8 in C major, Op. 88. Scherzo Capriccioso, Op. 66, London Symphony Orchestra conducted by Istvan Kertesz. Decca
LXT6044: 0 SXL6044 (12 in., 30s. 11 d. plus 5s. 0-21-d. P.T.).
Concertgcbouw, Scell (2(52) )R) Q ACL46
Phiib., Sawaliisch (1/55) © 33SX1034
LPO, Silvestri (11/58) © ALP1537: (7/62) OASD470 LSO, Doiati (6161) 9 MMA11128: 0 AMS16075 Philh., Ciuiini (11/62) 9 33CX1815 0 SAX2461 Boston SO, Munch (11/62) 9 RB6509 0 SB6509 Columbia SO, \Valtcr (1163) 9 BRG72097 9 SBRG72097
Here is yet another well-played performance of this popular symphony and it is difficult to say more than that it is recommendable along with several others. Kertesz conducts it with sympathy and gets excellent playing from the LSO. There is little that is unusual in his intepretation nor does one expect or want anything unusual in the performance of this generally cheerful and extrovert music, which is a very satisfactory state of affairs but doesn't give one much to write about! Naturally, he brings out some details of the score which particularly interest him and pays less attention to others, but the points are small and the comment can be made of any other conductor in the list above.
The stereo recording is excellent—the mono has not reached me—and considering this record in comparison only with those of comparable sound, I would choose between this one, Dorati and Walter. Dorati gets even smarter playing from the same orchestra, though somewhat at the cost of Dvoták's characteristic amiability; if it is the most sheerly brilliant performance you want, then this may be your choice. Walter will remain mine, if only because of his choice of speeds in the finale. Kertesz does the usual rush off at the first tutti, which is all very exciting though, as Walter shows, there are good reasons for keeping to something like the speed relationships suggested by Dvoták in the score. For one thing, the ensuing flute solo becomes lyrical and beautiful instead of being turned into a bit of breathless virtuosity. (As a matter of fact, you can usually hear even the best players snatching a breath, as the poor things obviously have to, but I must hand it to the LSO's Alexander Murray—he never seema to breathe at all.) More seriously, with less disparity of speeds, the whole movement hangs together so much better.
There is, however, the fill-up to affect Your choice and many will prefer the less hackneyed Scherzo caprice iwo to the Academic Festival Overture on Walter's record, especially as Kertesz brings it off very well indeed. It is an extremely difficult piece to play— hence, I suppose, its infrequent concert performance, for it is marvellous music-and it is tricky to conduct. Two of the other records of the symphony have this same fill-up, Sawallisch and Giulini; the Sawallisch is getting a little old, well as he conducts both works, the Giulini performance of the Scherzo Gapriccioso, slow and flabby, is one of the reasons I cannot recommend his record as a whole. T.H.

Ads by Google

Post a Comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

Register | Sign in

Comments
There are no comments yet.

The Gramophone Archive has been created using a process called Optical Character Recognition (OCR). Optical Character Recognition allows a computer to 'read' scanned versions of original magazine pages. The text will not always be read completely accurately. If you notice a problem with an article please use the report an error functionality so we may fix it by hand.

Report an error

Please ensure that the paragraph below contains the error you wish to report. If possible you can highlight the part of the text where the error occurs using your mouse (click the start at the error and drag to the end).