Members Log in | Not a member? Register 18 March 2010
Gramophone The Archive Beta


January 1958 - page                
17
Report an error
BACH. Goldberg Variations. Glenn Gould (piano).
Philips SBL5211 (12 in., 335. 81d.).
Landowska (5/54) ALP1139
Dennis (10/55) WLP5241
Leonhardt (5/56) PVL7010
With two piano versions and two harpsichord versions, competition is now equal, at least numerically. As AR left the matter, in his review of the Leonhardt performance, the better of the two harpsichord versions was Landowska's. Of the two pianists, there is no doubt whatever in my mind that Gould is superior in every way. Some of his tempi may be fast, but his is a speed connected with urgency more than with show or brilliance. He carries a phrase through a gigantic upward or downward sweep, effortless, controlled, and clear as crystal. Those listeners who, unlike Count Kayserling, fall asleep rather than keep awake through this forty-five minute ritual, will have no difficulty in keeping their eyes and ears open when they play this new Philips recording.
Gould has some of the clearest keyboard counterpoint I have heard for a long time and (unlike Demus) is sparing in his use of the pedal. Compare, for instance, the two versions of Variation 11, or of 14. In both cases Gould is faster, but the odd thing is that he is also clearer. Dennis produces a thick, rather muddy sound, makes too much of descending bass figures, and plods rather than plays. Sometimes I found it hard to believe that two corresponding variations were really the same music!
The Philips disc is helped by really splendid recording, with the piano tone full and sonorous, yet capable of the fine expressiveness required for Variations 21 and 25. This is a performance that I shall treasure, for it has the kind of architecture in tone which is often longed for but rarely found.
DS 

Ads by Google

Post a Comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

Register | Sign in

Comments
There are no comments yet.

The Gramophone Archive has been created using a process called Optical Character Recognition (OCR). Optical Character Recognition allows a computer to 'read' scanned versions of original magazine pages. The text will not always be read completely accurately. If you notice a problem with an article please use the report an error functionality so we may fix it by hand.

Report an error

Please ensure that the paragraph below contains the error you wish to report. If possible you can highlight the part of the text where the error occurs using your mouse (click the start at the error and drag to the end).